Economic Utility The Pleasure of Products

The utility is an economists way of measuring pleasure or happiness with a product, service, or labor and how it relates to the decisions that people make in purchasing or performing it. Utility measures the benefits (or drawbacks) from consuming a good or service or from work, and although utility is not directly measurable, it can be inferred from the decisions that people make. In economics,  marginal  utility  is usually described by a function, such as the exponential utility function. Expected Utility In measuring the utility of a certain good, service, or labor, economics use either expected or indirect utility to express the amount of pleasure from consuming or purchasing an object. Expected utility refers to the utility of an agent facing uncertainty and is calculated by considering possible state and constructing a weighted average of utility. These weights are therein determined by the probability of each state given the agents estimate. Expected utility is applied in any situation where the outcome of using the good or service or working is deemed to be a risk for the consumer. Essentially, it is hypothesized that the human decider may not always choose the higher expected value investment option. Such is the case in the example of being guaranteed a $1 payment or gambling for a $100 payment with a probability of reward at 1 in 80, otherwise getting nothing. This results in an expected value of $1.25. According  to the expected utility theory, a person may be so risk averse they will still choose the less valuable guarantee rather than gambling for the $1.25 expected value.   Indirect Utility For this purpose, the indirect utility is very much like a total utility, calculated via a function using variables of price, supply, and availability. It creates a  utility curve  to define and graph the subconscious and conscious factors that determine customer product valuation. The calculation relies on a function of variables like the availability of goods in the market (which is its maximum point) against a persons income versus a change in the price of goods. Though usually, consumers think of their preferences in terms of consumption rather than price.   In terms of microeconomics, the indirect utility function is the inverse of the expenditure function (when the price is kept constant), whereby the expenditure function determines the minimum amount of money a person must spend to receive any amount of utility from a good. Marginal Utility After you determine both of these functions, you can then determine the marginal utility of a good or service because marginal utility is defined as the utility gained from consuming one additional unit. Basically, the marginal utility is a way for economists to determine how much of a product consumers will buy.   Applying this to economic theory relies on the law of diminishing marginal utility which states that each subsequent unit of product or good consumed will diminish in value. In practical application, that would mean that once a consumer has used a single unit of a good, such as a slice of pizza, the next unit would have less utility.

Air Pollution Factors Responsible For Poor Air Quality

Introduction The Central Valley contains the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley, stretching from Redding to Bakersfield, which is the home to millions of residents. It was named as the Central Valley because its geographical location is in the center of the state of California which is surrounded by mountain ranges. The bowl shaped valley contains all the emissions and activities that the residents cause from travelling to work and other places. Not only does the Central Valley get its pollution from the valley, but it also gets air pollution that are transported from the Bay Area (valleyair.org). Due to the valley’s bowl shape, it traps the pollution which causes many issues and is a serious problem. This research paper will focus on the major source of air pollution, factors responsible for poor air quality, impacts of air pollutants in the valley, and regulations. Major Source of Air Pollutants The major source to air pollution in the Central Valley is the emissions from factories and automobiles. Burning fossil fuels has become a daily part of our lives since the industrial time because it powers transporting vehicles, buildings, and many appliances that we need. It is difficult to contain the burning of fossil fuels to a minimum, which is the major cause of air pollution, because many people rely heavily on it. Each vehicle that is being used emits fumes from the car exhaust which contains hazardous gases that are harmful to whoever breaths it in. The gases thatShow MoreRelatedIn 1789 Thomas Malthus, English Cleric And Scholar, Studied1008 Words   |  5 PagesEarth’s capacity. Overpopulation is a result of various factors such as improvements in medical facilities. Moreover, overpopulation also has a critical impact on the environment and is a salient issue in the modern world as it has led to many economical and sociological issues. Even though some may argue th at overpopulation does not have negative impacts on society and the environment, it leads to environmental degradation such air and water pollution, global warming, deforestation, and lack of vitalRead MoreEssay on Low Health Expectancy1034 Words   |  5 PagesGroup B Assessment Title: Essay Assessment Title: What are the factors which contribute to low health expectancy in developing countries? Discuss possible solutions to reduce this problem. Tutor Name: Andrew Nummey Student ID Number: 200860429 Date of Submission: Friday 2nd December 2011 Word count:966 STUDENT ID: 200860429 MODULE CODE: FC501 3T ANDREW NUMMEY What are the factors which contribute to low health expectancy in developing countriesRead MoreAir Pollution Essay1335 Words   |  6 Pages In recent years, air pollution has become a growing problem in China (Zhang, Chao). According to the newly released scientific paper by Dan Levin, outdoor air pollution contrib7utes to the deaths of 1.6 million people in China every year, and about 4,400 people a day (Levin, Dan). Essentially, air is a major part of our overall health. However, people (including ourselves), especially living in developed countries, suffer from the exposure of air pollution. This potentially puts our health at riskRead More Air Pollution in Mexico City Essay1224 Words   |  5 PagesAir Pollution in Mexico City Mexico City adds an estimated one million new residents each year, resulting in one million new aggravates to the city’s already abominable air quality (Collins, 119). Over the span of a generation, Mexico City’s air has gone from being one of the world’s cleanest to one of the world’s most polluted, as well as the most polluted in its country. The average visibility in the city is down from almost 100 km in the 1940s to only 1.5 km today, removing theRead MoreA Strategy For Reducing Air Pollution911 Words   |  4 PagesSUBJECT A strategy for reducing Air Pollution in Beijing by 2022. PURPOSE The purpose of the paper is to recommend options to reduce air pollution in Beijing. BACKGROUND China’s fastest growing economy is often referred in coupled with the clogging pollution of its cities. The air pollution in Beijing remains among the worst in the world and thus has drawn alarming environmental attention. It’s devastating effects on mankind and environment is a serious challenge China has been facing over theRead MoreAir Quality Effects On Humans886 Words   |  4 Pages 1.1 Air Quality Effects on Humans Air quality in America is a very important topic. Humans breathe every day, approximately 3,000 gallons of air. Without it, we cannot live1. Breathing air, which contains pollutants, can be harmful to human health. Minimally, polluted air can cause burning eyes and noses along with an irritated throat and difficulty breathing. Additionally, for people with asthma, which includes over 30 million Americans, pollutants can aggravate respiratory problemsRead MoreGestational Diabetes Research Report1063 Words   |  5 Pages Research Report 1 Preconception and Early Pregnancy Air Pollution Exposures and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Alex Ausborn Mercer University College of Health Professions: Public Health Dr. Kennedy 10/12/2017 â€Æ' Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO) (2017), air pollution is a contamination of both the indoor/outdoor environment by any chemical, physical or biological agent that alters our natural environment; some of the most concerning pollutants of public healthRead MoreEnvironmental Hazards And Environmental Health Hazards1096 Words   |  5 PagesHumans are constantly interacting with the environment. As a result, maintaining a healthy environment is key to increasing quality of life and years of healthy life. Globally, nearly one-quarter of the global disease burden, and more than one-third of the burden among children, is due to modifiable environmental factors. (Prà ¼ss-ÃÅ"stà ¼n, 2006). Environmental health hazards generally fall into one of three categories: physical, chemical, or biological. The impact an environmental hazard may have onRead MoreIndoor Air Quality And Environmental Health Essay2305 Words   |  10 PagesIndoor Air Quality and Environment al Health Indoor air quality (IAQ) refers only to the quality of the ambient air in an interior environment. On average, people spend well over half of their time inside, and research has shown that indoor air in buildings can be more contaminated than outdoor air. The majority of people that work in non-industrial buildings such as offices, schools, and hospitals are exposed daily to poor IAQ. Indoor air pollution (IAP) continually ranks among the top five environmentalRead MoreSustainability: Ethical and Social Responsibility Dimensions Essay1069 Words   |  5 Pagesof our natural resources such as air, water, land, biodiversity, and renewable natural resources. Governments around the world have responded to pressures put on the sustainability of these resources by environmental protection laws. Companies have been increasingly incorporating these issues into their business strategies to not only reduce their own environmental impact, but to create a reputation as eco-responsible compani es. Issues Raised Air pollution can harm animals, plants and bodies

The Significance of Sibling and Peer interaction on Children Free Essays

Within the field of child psychology much emphasis has been placed on the relationship and interactions of mother and child (Harris, 1998; Pinker, 2002). This essay intends to highlight the significance of another kind of interaction, that of the child and his/her siblings and peers, with the view to show how this type of interaction can have an impact on subsequent development. In the process, the essay will evaluate the research carried out and the evidence gained within this area by way of critical analysis. We will write a custom essay sample on The Significance of Sibling and Peer interaction on Children or any similar topic only for you Order Now As an added aid the essay will take examples from the died material: Media Kit Part 1, Video Band 2: Zero to Hero as supplied by Open university (2006). The type of interaction mainly focused upon here is play; as this is the catalysis by which young children, from toddler-hood onwards, engage with other children. Littleton and Mill (2005) recognize this type of interaction as ‘important sites for development’ where new skills can be acquired and tested out in ways that could not with adults. To help better define this type of relationship between sibling and peers it is perhaps best to distinguish them from the other main type of relationship that children find homeless in. Schaffer, (1996) uses the term vertical relationship to describe a type of relationship that is characterized by an inequality of social power and knowledge level between adult and child. It is marked also by a complementarily of roles whereby the child may ask for help and a parent or caregiver may offer it. This is in contrast to the horizontal relationship that is marked more so for its reciprocity and equality of social power and knowledge. A good example being between two children of similar age. This peer relationship is similar in nature to hat of sibling relationships however as Schaffer (1996) notes, in this case the sibling relationship has the unique quality of being able to share both characteristics of, on the one hand reciprocity, whereby siblings can co-operate successfully in play situations and on the other, a marked age difference can see the older sibling as part time teacher and guide. This idea would have had its beginnings in the early social constructivism perspective. Bigotry (1986) purported the belief that interaction and collaboration with peers equal and more capable, promotes learning and creates what he called a Zone of Proximal Development, where children of different abilities learn from each other. One of the methods they do this is by what Schaffer (2003) describes as ‘scaffolding whereby support is offered for learning however the task is not simplified. The ability to play with others has also been described as a ‘skilled international accomplishment’ because of the complex skills involved, such as sensitivity to the needs of others, negotiation and conflict management skills (Littleton and Mill, 2005). But to play with people on must have the ability to Join in with others. In the video Zero to Hero supplied by Open University (2006), Professor Robert Winston lists certain factors that affect a child’s ability to Join in with others including premature birth, shyness and laughter. Smith et al. , (1999) sees laughter as an important social signal for children within play fighting both for the child to use and for the child to interpret others meaning of it. Smith et al. , (1999) also cite the ability to regulate emotion, turn-taking skills and the ability to understand another person’s point of view as important social skills, not Just added for successful social interaction but are actively developed and practiced in play situations. Open University (2006) illustrates these points by showing the use of classic experiments such as a version of the ‘marshmallow experiment (Muscle, 1974) where a child is sat in front of a marshmallow and told that he/she can have twice the amount if they can wait a specified time. Its been suggested from results that children able to wait or ‘delay gratification’ are better able to control emotions and is a better indication of academic and social success in their teens than IQ scores. Also being able to hold back like this does increase a child’s popularity In another example children of about three years are shown how to play Which hand is the coin in game’ where a person places a coin in one hand in full view of the child sitting opposite. The hand is then placed behind the back and both hands are re- presented closed for the child to guess which hand the coin is now in. Open University (2006) suggests that most children at this age cannot play this game from the alternative position as they believe that the other person already knows which hand the coin is in. This idea could be seen to come from the Paginating concept of ‘egocentrics’ whereby the child’s dominance of their own perceptions leaves them unable to see things from another’s perspective. Pigged elucidated this aspect through his Three Mountains Task (Pigged and Inhaler, 1972) Counter to this however, Open University (2006) go on to show the child named ‘Rubin’ as not only able to play the game, but also able to predict What other children will do’. They imply the reason for this as a result of his home life dynamic. Here, Rubin lives with his two brothers and all have different fathers suggesting a lot of interaction with different types of people but mainly that play with his siblings is significant. This emphasis on sibling interaction as a cause for Robin’s advancement, when held up against Piglet’s stage theory of intellectual development (in Dates, Cheesy and Wood, 2005), suggests that early and sustained interaction with siblings can contribute to a change in normal developmental cognitive structures. This assumption is arrived at through the underlying nature of any stage theory where, by definition imply distinct boundaries between stages where independent processes take place (Amounts, 2009). Piglet’s theory places Robin’s changes as occurring by the end of his second, Pre-operational stage or at the beginning of his Concrete operational stage where the child is moving away from egocentric thinking. The age put on this stage of development is around six years, notably different from Robin’s three. In another study by Dunn (1988), children from a very young age were shown to have the ability co-operate with each other and engage in complex types of play such as fantasy play whereby other identities were taken on requiring different forms of language (Corsair, 1986). Dunn (1988) even showed that children as young as eight months were able to share and recognize the mood of a sibling and by fourteen months had the ability to co-operate in another’s goals. However, the idea that examples can be found that find children performing better then Pigged would have originally predicted is not something new. Donaldson Hiding the Policeman experiment is a case in point (Donaldson and Hughes, 1978), as are other examples (Miscarriage and Donaldson, 1974; Light et al. , 1979). The intent of this essay at this point however, is not to argue the individual merits of Paginating theory, for even Donaldson criticisms can be regarded as an enhancement of the theory rather than a dismissing out of hand. It can be suggested that her argument is based on children’s reasoning being regarded as more sophisticated then first proposed, with the emphasis now to be placed within the social context for which a situation occurred, I. . That things make ‘human sense’ to the child (Dates et al. , 2005). Instead the point here is to show that by using this influential developmental approach that the significance of peer and sibling interaction can be more clearly en. For it should also be noted that Pigged himself valued this cognitive development aspect of peer relationships, referring to it as socio-cognitive conflict where he argued that these interactions exposed the child to conflicting views from people who were of equal status to themselves thus motivating a rethink of their own understandings. The power imbalance of adult’s interactions lends to this (Dates et In light of what has been said so far it could be argued that peer and sibling relationships contribute to advancement in cognitive and social skills. However, as Cantor et al. (1999) warns that social competence should not be conceived as a static set of abilities and that other factors in the child’s environment should also be considered to contribute too child’s development. And so taking again our real life example ‘Rubin’, one would expect that his advanced developmental and social skills would lead too socially more successful life. To the contrary Rubin was reported by almost half his class (and later by assessment) as displaying somewhat anti-social behaviors. One reason Open University (2006) gives for this is a lack of concentration, which, it is hoped, will be remedied with fish oil supplements. The second reason, it is suggested is partly due to instability within the home environment. Robin’s mother is pregnant and this is causing tensions with her partner. The point to be drawn from this however, is that although play and interaction with siblings and peers is important for a child’s development it should not be taken as a prescription for normal or ‘healthy patterns’ of development (Schaffer, 1996) at least by western industrialized standards. Instead a more holistic approach should be adopted with regard to the multi-dimensional dynamic of a person’s developmental thaw from birth to maturity. Perhaps a good model to consider would be Sombreros (1987) Transactional model of development. There are limitations however of psychologists accounts in this area. One such being the lack of research and evidence into the ever growing use of new technologies by young people when engaging in social activity. Maybe (2003) notes that the prevalence of mobile phone use has created an environment that allows for young people to have twenty-four hour contact with each other without parental interference thus, providing a greater level of privacy and independence. However, it would also be noted that Dunn (2004) has valued this privacy aspect of friendship in early interactions as it aids young people in ciphering out the ‘intricate balance of power and status between people’ as well as giving them experience in relationships different from that which they share with their parents. This could also be construed as the beginnings of independence. Another limitation is that the majority of the research noted here has been carried out in westernizes societies. How to cite The Significance of Sibling and Peer interaction on Children, Papers

Historical Battle Analysis Battle of Inchon free essay sample

Battle Analysis: Battle of Inchon, 1950 On 25 June 1950, North Korea forces launched a surprise invasion on South Korea under the command of Kim Il-sung and the North Korean People’s Army. During this time, the North Korean People’s Army forced through the 38th parallel and pushed through the unprepared Republic of Korea forces to the Southeast Pusan peninsula. The approximately 125 mile defensive perimeter was the point where United Nation forces withdrew to by August, 1950 and held that Southeast position of the peninsula. While UN forces were outnumbered, commanders were in search for a new course of action that would help skew the war in favor of them. At this point, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur first conceived his plan for what would become the Battle of Inchon. Inchon is located in the Northwestern corner of modern South Korea and was a key location for the North Korean forces. Inchon, located just 25 miles west of the nation’s capital, Seoul, was a key location for North Korean resupplies. Friendly intelligence and air reconnaissance observed that there were two major supply lines that were along the two major highways coming from both the northeast and northwest. It was through these two major supply lines that North Korean forces were able to then disseminate supplies throughout the South Korean peninsula and ultimately down to the Pusan area in the southeast corner. Because Inchon was such a key location for enemy resupply, General of the Army MacArthur chose to attack the enemy at this point. Many criticized General MacArthur’s decisions to plan an attack on Inchon for many reasons. To start, an amphibious attack on Inchon would be difficult due to the disadvantageous terrain, high and sporadic tides on shore, and the fact that the seawalls were easily defendable. However, General MacArthur chose this type of attack on this specific location because of these facts, stating that the enemy would not expect an attack from such a disadvantageous point. The mission was to capture Inchon, Seoul, and disrupt enemy resupply into the rest of the South Korea peninsula. General MacArthur then held a conference in August in Tokyo, Japan with the head commanders of the armed forces and other UN commanders to discuss the planning of an amphibious attack, known later on as Operation Chromite. During the planning phase of Operation Chromite, General MacArthur tasked Major General Edward Almond as the Corps Commander for the operation. The 10th Corps was created and had at its disposal the 1st Marine Division based out of California (and at that point deployed throughout the world), and the Army 7th Infantry Division. General MacArthur then had to plan the way in which he would initiate the attack due to the tidal conditions on the Inchon shore. Because the tidal conditions were so poor and so disadvantageous, studies that were conducted showed the mid-September would be the more effective time to initiate the attack. However, special tactics were still necessary in order to accomplish the mission in this area. Mud flats were seen to be present during low tides, so to combat this problem, waves of troops would be sent in and be required to wait approximately 3 hours before reinforcements could be sent in. Now that the planning phase was near complete, orders were soon made to prepare the area with air strikes and other bombers. Two days prior to the initial attack on 15 September 1950, pre-invasion bombardments were ordered. On 13 September and 14 September, B-29 Bombers and other bombers were sent in for air strikes on Inchon and surrounding areas in order to prepare the area for invasion that would soon follow. Battleships from UN forces would fire on the Inchon area beforehand and also attack up to four other coastal cities in order confuse the enemy before the invasion. Additionally, UN forces sent six major battleship destroyers to hone in on the enemy and initiate contact. Once the enemy land batteries were located, their location was recorded and processed so that their location was known and pinpointed for naval and air attacks later on during the operation. Now that the pre-invasion bombardment was established and complete, Operation Chromite was ready to begin the next day. On 15 September 1950, UN naval ships left Japan with the 10th Corps troops heading for the west coast of Korea. At 0600 that day, the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment would land on a local island off the coast of Inchon to secure the location for the attack to commence. At 1800, during high tide, the remainder of the 5th Marine Regiment and the 1st Marine Regiment would simultaneously attack Inchon from the North and South, respectively. They would attack the Green Beach on Wolmi-do Island. The attack was constructed into three elements, attacked in separate areas on the shore, separated into â€Å"Green Beach† â€Å"Red Beach† â€Å"Blue Beach†. Each of these locations were advantageous in their own ways and combined to create an overall advantage in the mission to capture Inchon. Later on, the 7th Marine regiment would also be used for support in the operation. During the entire operation at this time, General MacArthur would be observing from the commanders ship off the coast. While the Marine regiments were attacking Inchon and securing the location, the Army’s 7th Infantry Division would enter through Inchon and head south toward Suwon in order to establish a blockade along that major road and also create a flank on the southern end. The intent of this was to set up a double sided attack on North Korean forces in the center of the peninsula since there were already friendly forces all the way on the southeast peninsula in Pusan. While these attacks were occurring, due in part to the tidal conditions of the region, reinforcement capabilities at that time were not sent in for another ten hours. Despite this minor disadvantage for the UN forces, North Korean and Communist forces soon surrendered after only like opposing force and Inchon was ultimately captured and secured. Once Inchon was secure, General of the Army MacArthur came to visit Major General Almond, 10th Corps Commander, to discuss future operations of the 10th Corps on 19 September 1950. Following this meeting, the 5th Marine Regiment travelled along the west bank to cross and secure the Han River for future amphibious attacks. This was the greatest barrier between Inchon and Seoul. Although the river was wide and the terrain was not advantageous, it was soon secured by the 5th Marine Regiment for future operations. While the Han River was being secured, the 8th Army, commanded by Lieutenant General Walton H. Walker, headed for Seoul now that the North Korean and Communist forces had resupply efforts cut off by the 10th Corps’ success. In a turn of events, on 17 September, the Kimpo airfield was captured and secured, soon becoming operational by the 5th Marine Regiment. The Kimpo airfield was now capable of airlifts and friendly resupply and had nearly 400 tons of new supplies come in daily for supporting forces. General MacArthur now visited the Kimpo airfield to further consult with his fellow combat commanders and to continue to plan for the capture of Seoul and defeat the enemy forces. It was at this point that the 187th Airborne Infantry Regiment was called up from being in reserve in Japan. On 23 September they were called up and ordered to capture and secure the Kimpo peninsula, a bordering area of Inchon and Seoul. Once these supporting elements were ordered and established, it was time for the main effort to capture and secure the capital of Seoul. On 24 September, the 5th Marine Regiment headed for Seoul along with support from the 1st Marine Regiment as well. Now in more suburban warfare environment within the heart of the city, various communist units held buildings in the area. Then while this was underway, the 7th Infantry Division was ordered to now enter Seoul from the south to aid in support after just successfully capturing the Suwon airfield. Now that these various units were attacking Seoul from nearly all angles, 10th Corps Commander Major General Almond ordered the 7th Infantry Division to additionally commit a regiment to cross the, now secure, Han River, and capture the South Mountain. Their follow on mission was to flank Seoul from the south in supporting the other units already there at this time. On 25 September at 0630, the Army regiment that was sent reached the bank and took small arms contact. Despite this, by noon they captured South Mountain, which was a major terrain feature with various advantages to it. Now that units were placed on all the surrounding points of Seoul, the UN forces were gaining momentum and advantage over the area. On 26 September, North Korean enemy forces were forced out of the city. Soon after, on 27 September, the 7th Army Division troops met up with the 1st Calvary Division, leaving many communist troops trapped by US forces in the middle of the peninsula. On 29 September, General MacArthur participated in the Seoul liberation ceremony, in which he restored order and power to the South Korean authorities. At this point, the 10th Corps was relieved of all tactical responsibilities on 07 October. After just 22 days, the mission was complete and the UN forces, under General MacArthur’s command, were able to capture and secure Inchon, Seoul, and defeat the enemy at key resupply points. Operation Chromite also suffered many casualties. Throughout the battle, 566 were reported killed and 2,713 reported wounded for the UN forces. The North Korean People’s Army lost an estimated 35,000 killed, captured, or wounded. The aftermath of the Battle of Inchon was a turning point in the Korean War because of the advantage it then gave UN forces in what seemed to be a soon defeat when they were cornered at the Pusan peninsula. Although many criticized General MacArthur for his initial plan, the surprise and methodical planning of Operation Chromite was seen as a success for UN forces. When analyzing the Battle of Inchon, we see that all nine principles of war were evident during this battle. We will see that Mass, Objective, Offensive, Surprise, Economy of Force, Maneuver, Unity of Command, Security, and Simplicity were all factors seen during this battle. Mass is concentrated combat power at a distinct time and place during war. Mass is about synchronizing elements to create the desired result in the most time efficient manner. Mass is required to be quick, decisive, and coordinated in order to create the most efficient attack on the objective or enemy. During the Battle of Inchon, mass was seen when all units, where needed and most efficient, were used to attack Inchon and Seoul. During the initial amphibious attack on Inchon, various regiments were used to attack the enemy. Additionally, the Marine and Army units were able to capture and secure the location in a time efficient manner, capture Inchon in only a few days. Forces were concentrated and focused on certain objectives throughout the Operation. Whether it be on Inchon, the Suwon blocking position, or Seoul, forces were concentrated in order to have the greatest and most effective effect. Through these examples, Mass was seen as a component in the Battle of Inchon. Objective is the clearly defined, decisive, and attainable target or objective that is the goal for the mission or operation. Objective is also about disrupting the enemy and rendering them incapable of war. This principle can be seen during the two main objectives of Inchon first, then Seoul. Both these were clearly defined objectives with a clear purpose, a clear goal and mission statement. Inchon was a key objective due to its advantageous link and route to Seoul. And then Seoul was key due to the two major supply routes that ran directly through the city. By targeting Seoul and the supply lines, the objective and mission statement was clear and concise. These objectives also clearly disrupted enemy forces by both keeping the enemy busy in battle and also by limiting supplies to the area and throughout the rest of the peninsula. Objective is also a principle that we see as a clear component in this battle through its objective and clear mission end state. Offensive is the holding, seizing, and retaining objectives by getting decisive results. The goal is to have the enemy react to you based on your chosen actions or attack. Offensive is seen in the Battle of Inchon when Inchon, along with the two major airfields were seized. By seizing Inchon and the key air fields, UN forces were able to hold these key areas in order to maintain the advantage that they wanted. Additionally, once the airfields were secure, they acquired the freedom of action to then send in airlifts and resupplies to help their cause. The attacks on Inchon and capturing the airfields then required the enemy to react to UN actions and to react to the chosen acts they made and initiated. Offensive is seen in the Battle of Inchon through the airfields and attack on Inchon itself. Surprise is maintaining control in a situation by attacking the enemy when unprepared. Surprise is necessary in order to maintain the advantage during an attack. Surprise requires an attack when the enemy is unprepared. Surprise was evident during the Battle of Inchon in the location choice off the west coast. This area was seen as not being an advantageous location, but nevertheless, General MacArthur picked this because it would catch the enemy unprepared. The enemy never would imagine an attack of that magnitude on the Inchon shores because of the tidal conditions, seawall defenses, and other terrain features. This element of surprise was able to have the enemy off guard and not have enough resources to attack with enough strength necessary. Surprise was a key element that led to the success of Operation Chromite in the end. Economy of force is about using as little force as necessary to ensure mission success. Economy of force is using the necessary amount of units needed while still having an effective armed forces. All elements need a purpose in order to be used effectively during an operation. Economy of force was used when attacking and recapturing the capital of Seoul. Various units were used in order to effectively have the city surrounded and supported by UN forces. While units all had an essential and clear role in surrounding and capturing the city, units were then moved and used to support other areas that would support the overall mission. This was seen when a regiment of the 7th Infantry Division was ordered to flank around the city in order to support the mission form the south. Economy of force was evident during this battle as units were used as necessary in order to create the most effective result within as minimum force needed. Maneuver is about creating the most effective movement during an operation that gives them the greatest advantage, protection, and ultimately, the upper hand. Maneuver is about the ability to use flexible combat power. Maneuver was seen in the Battle of Inchon by the movement and maneuver of the units used to flank Inchon, Seoul, and other key locations that were captured. By maneuvering elements to flank around and catch the enemy off guard, UN forces were able to gain the advantage during battle. Maneuver was also seen when entering the Inchon shore and having units coordinate with the tidal conditions, although a disadvantage at some points, it was an advantage later on as units were then on the shores and able to attack the enemy. Maneuver is a component that is seen throughout the Battle of Inchon as well. Unity of command is about having one commander throughout an operation to ensure clear leadership. Overall, General of the Army MacArthur was the commander of the UN forces during Operation Chromite and create the plan that was then prepared for and executed. General MacArthur was able to lead the UN forces during this time so that they would effectively disrupt the enemy, its resupply, and capture key areas. Furthermore, Major General Almond can be seen as unity of command under the 10th Corps during the 22 day operation. Unity of command was clearly seen during the Battle of Inchon and throughout the Korean War. Security is about maintaining control of areas, intelligence, and acquiring counter intelligence when necessary. Security is key during battle to ensure success and to maintain the upper hand. Security was maintained throughout the Battle of Inchon in a variety of ways. First, intelligence and reconnaissance was conducted and collected prior to the pre-invasion bombardments. Furthermore, the island off the coast was first secure for friendly units. Security was always the top priority for each of the areas that the UN forces sought to capture. Security was maintained at all times during the Battle of Inchon to ensure that at no point was the upper hand given to the enemy. The final principle of war is simplicity, which is having a clear, concise, and uncomplicated plan. Simplicity is key so that all elements are able to understand their purpose, and the commander’s intent and end state. Simplicity was seen throughout the Battle of Inchon because of the simple flanking that UN forces would initiate to capture key areas and locations. Simplicity is the ability to create a basic plan that all can understand, which all participating units during the Battle of Inchon understood during that time. All nine of the principles of war can be clearly seen in the Battle of Inchon. Each principle is key in the planning, preparation, and execution of each element of the battle. Every step had each of these principles in mind and this factor led to the success of General MacArthur and the UN forces. The Battle of Inchon can be seen as a success for the UN forces because of its successful planning and results in capturing Inchon, Seoul, and key airfields and locations. The importance of this battle was not only to capture these areas, but to also ultimately create the opportunity for forces down in the southeast Pusan peninsula to be able to attack back and push the North Korean People’s Army farther north.

Historical Battle Analysis Battle of Inchon free essay sample

Battle Analysis: Battle of Inchon, 1950 On 25 June 1950, North Korea forces launched a surprise invasion on South Korea under the command of Kim Il-sung and the North Korean People’s Army. During this time, the North Korean People’s Army forced through the 38th parallel and pushed through the unprepared Republic of Korea forces to the Southeast Pusan peninsula. The approximately 125 mile defensive perimeter was the point where United Nation forces withdrew to by August, 1950 and held that Southeast position of the peninsula. While UN forces were outnumbered, commanders were in search for a new course of action that would help skew the war in favor of them. At this point, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur first conceived his plan for what would become the Battle of Inchon. Inchon is located in the Northwestern corner of modern South Korea and was a key location for the North Korean forces. Inchon, located just 25 miles west of the nation’s capital, Seoul, was a key location for North Korean resupplies. Friendly intelligence and air reconnaissance observed that there were two major supply lines that were along the two major highways coming from both the northeast and northwest. It was through these two major supply lines that North Korean forces were able to then disseminate supplies throughout the South Korean peninsula and ultimately down to the Pusan area in the southeast corner. Because Inchon was such a key location for enemy resupply, General of the Army MacArthur chose to attack the enemy at this point. Many criticized General MacArthur’s decisions to plan an attack on Inchon for many reasons. To start, an amphibious attack on Inchon would be difficult due to the disadvantageous terrain, high and sporadic tides on shore, and the fact that the seawalls were easily defendable. However, General MacArthur chose this type of attack on this specific location because of these facts, stating that the enemy would not expect an attack from such a disadvantageous point. The mission was to capture Inchon, Seoul, and disrupt enemy resupply into the rest of the South Korea peninsula. General MacArthur then held a conference in August in Tokyo, Japan with the head commanders of the armed forces and other UN commanders to discuss the planning of an amphibious attack, known later on as Operation Chromite. During the planning phase of Operation Chromite, General MacArthur tasked Major General Edward Almond as the Corps Commander for the operation. The 10th Corps was created and had at its disposal the 1st Marine Division based out of California (and at that point deployed throughout the world), and the Army 7th Infantry Division. General MacArthur then had to plan the way in which he would initiate the attack due to the tidal conditions on the Inchon shore. Because the tidal conditions were so poor and so disadvantageous, studies that were conducted showed the mid-September would be the more effective time to initiate the attack. However, special tactics were still necessary in order to accomplish the mission in this area. Mud flats were seen to be present during low tides, so to combat this problem, waves of troops would be sent in and be required to wait approximately 3 hours before reinforcements could be sent in. Now that the planning phase was near complete, orders were soon made to prepare the area with air strikes and other bombers. Two days prior to the initial attack on 15 September 1950, pre-invasion bombardments were ordered. On 13 September and 14 September, B-29 Bombers and other bombers were sent in for air strikes on Inchon and surrounding areas in order to prepare the area for invasion that would soon follow. Battleships from UN forces would fire on the Inchon area beforehand and also attack up to four other coastal cities in order confuse the enemy before the invasion. Additionally, UN forces sent six major battleship destroyers to hone in on the enemy and initiate contact. Once the enemy land batteries were located, their location was recorded and processed so that their location was known and pinpointed for naval and air attacks later on during the operation. Now that the pre-invasion bombardment was established and complete, Operation Chromite was ready to begin the next day. On 15 September 1950, UN naval ships left Japan with the 10th Corps troops heading for the west coast of Korea. At 0600 that day, the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment would land on a local island off the coast of Inchon to secure the location for the attack to commence. At 1800, during high tide, the remainder of the 5th Marine Regiment and the 1st Marine Regiment would simultaneously attack Inchon from the North and South, respectively. They would attack the Green Beach on Wolmi-do Island. The attack was constructed into three elements, attacked in separate areas on the shore, separated into â€Å"Green Beach† â€Å"Red Beach† â€Å"Blue Beach†. Each of these locations were advantageous in their own ways and combined to create an overall advantage in the mission to capture Inchon. Later on, the 7th Marine regiment would also be used for support in the operation. During the entire operation at this time, General MacArthur would be observing from the commanders ship off the coast. While the Marine regiments were attacking Inchon and securing the location, the Army’s 7th Infantry Division would enter through Inchon and head south toward Suwon in order to establish a blockade along that major road and also create a flank on the southern end. The intent of this was to set up a double sided attack on North Korean forces in the center of the peninsula since there were already friendly forces all the way on the southeast peninsula in Pusan. While these attacks were occurring, due in part to the tidal conditions of the region, reinforcement capabilities at that time were not sent in for another ten hours. Despite this minor disadvantage for the UN forces, North Korean and Communist forces soon surrendered after only like opposing force and Inchon was ultimately captured and secured. Once Inchon was secure, General of the Army MacArthur came to visit Major General Almond, 10th Corps Commander, to discuss future operations of the 10th Corps on 19 September 1950. Following this meeting, the 5th Marine Regiment travelled along the west bank to cross and secure the Han River for future amphibious attacks. This was the greatest barrier between Inchon and Seoul. Although the river was wide and the terrain was not advantageous, it was soon secured by the 5th Marine Regiment for future operations. While the Han River was being secured, the 8th Army, commanded by Lieutenant General Walton H. Walker, headed for Seoul now that the North Korean and Communist forces had resupply efforts cut off by the 10th Corps’ success. In a turn of events, on 17 September, the Kimpo airfield was captured and secured, soon becoming operational by the 5th Marine Regiment. The Kimpo airfield was now capable of airlifts and friendly resupply and had nearly 400 tons of new supplies come in daily for supporting forces. General MacArthur now visited the Kimpo airfield to further consult with his fellow combat commanders and to continue to plan for the capture of Seoul and defeat the enemy forces. It was at this point that the 187th Airborne Infantry Regiment was called up from being in reserve in Japan. On 23 September they were called up and ordered to capture and secure the Kimpo peninsula, a bordering area of Inchon and Seoul. Once these supporting elements were ordered and established, it was time for the main effort to capture and secure the capital of Seoul. On 24 September, the 5th Marine Regiment headed for Seoul along with support from the 1st Marine Regiment as well. Now in more suburban warfare environment within the heart of the city, various communist units held buildings in the area. Then while this was underway, the 7th Infantry Division was ordered to now enter Seoul from the south to aid in support after just successfully capturing the Suwon airfield. Now that these various units were attacking Seoul from nearly all angles, 10th Corps Commander Major General Almond ordered the 7th Infantry Division to additionally commit a regiment to cross the, now secure, Han River, and capture the South Mountain. Their follow on mission was to flank Seoul from the south in supporting the other units already there at this time. On 25 September at 0630, the Army regiment that was sent reached the bank and took small arms contact. Despite this, by noon they captured South Mountain, which was a major terrain feature with various advantages to it. Now that units were placed on all the surrounding points of Seoul, the UN forces were gaining momentum and advantage over the area. On 26 September, North Korean enemy forces were forced out of the city. Soon after, on 27 September, the 7th Army Division troops met up with the 1st Calvary Division, leaving many communist troops trapped by US forces in the middle of the peninsula. On 29 September, General MacArthur participated in the Seoul liberation ceremony, in which he restored order and power to the South Korean authorities. At this point, the 10th Corps was relieved of all tactical responsibilities on 07 October. After just 22 days, the mission was complete and the UN forces, under General MacArthur’s command, were able to capture and secure Inchon, Seoul, and defeat the enemy at key resupply points. Operation Chromite also suffered many casualties. Throughout the battle, 566 were reported killed and 2,713 reported wounded for the UN forces. The North Korean People’s Army lost an estimated 35,000 killed, captured, or wounded. The aftermath of the Battle of Inchon was a turning point in the Korean War because of the advantage it then gave UN forces in what seemed to be a soon defeat when they were cornered at the Pusan peninsula. Although many criticized General MacArthur for his initial plan, the surprise and methodical planning of Operation Chromite was seen as a success for UN forces. When analyzing the Battle of Inchon, we see that all nine principles of war were evident during this battle. We will see that Mass, Objective, Offensive, Surprise, Economy of Force, Maneuver, Unity of Command, Security, and Simplicity were all factors seen during this battle. Mass is concentrated combat power at a distinct time and place during war. Mass is about synchronizing elements to create the desired result in the most time efficient manner. Mass is required to be quick, decisive, and coordinated in order to create the most efficient attack on the objective or enemy. During the Battle of Inchon, mass was seen when all units, where needed and most efficient, were used to attack Inchon and Seoul. During the initial amphibious attack on Inchon, various regiments were used to attack the enemy. Additionally, the Marine and Army units were able to capture and secure the location in a time efficient manner, capture Inchon in only a few days. Forces were concentrated and focused on certain objectives throughout the Operation. Whether it be on Inchon, the Suwon blocking position, or Seoul, forces were concentrated in order to have the greatest and most effective effect. Through these examples, Mass was seen as a component in the Battle of Inchon. Objective is the clearly defined, decisive, and attainable target or objective that is the goal for the mission or operation. Objective is also about disrupting the enemy and rendering them incapable of war. This principle can be seen during the two main objectives of Inchon first, then Seoul. Both these were clearly defined objectives with a clear purpose, a clear goal and mission statement. Inchon was a key objective due to its advantageous link and route to Seoul. And then Seoul was key due to the two major supply routes that ran directly through the city. By targeting Seoul and the supply lines, the objective and mission statement was clear and concise. These objectives also clearly disrupted enemy forces by both keeping the enemy busy in battle and also by limiting supplies to the area and throughout the rest of the peninsula. Objective is also a principle that we see as a clear component in this battle through its objective and clear mission end state. Offensive is the holding, seizing, and retaining objectives by getting decisive results. The goal is to have the enemy react to you based on your chosen actions or attack. Offensive is seen in the Battle of Inchon when Inchon, along with the two major airfields were seized. By seizing Inchon and the key air fields, UN forces were able to hold these key areas in order to maintain the advantage that they wanted. Additionally, once the airfields were secure, they acquired the freedom of action to then send in airlifts and resupplies to help their cause. The attacks on Inchon and capturing the airfields then required the enemy to react to UN actions and to react to the chosen acts they made and initiated. Offensive is seen in the Battle of Inchon through the airfields and attack on Inchon itself. Surprise is maintaining control in a situation by attacking the enemy when unprepared. Surprise is necessary in order to maintain the advantage during an attack. Surprise requires an attack when the enemy is unprepared. Surprise was evident during the Battle of Inchon in the location choice off the west coast. This area was seen as not being an advantageous location, but nevertheless, General MacArthur picked this because it would catch the enemy unprepared. The enemy never would imagine an attack of that magnitude on the Inchon shores because of the tidal conditions, seawall defenses, and other terrain features. This element of surprise was able to have the enemy off guard and not have enough resources to attack with enough strength necessary. Surprise was a key element that led to the success of Operation Chromite in the end. Economy of force is about using as little force as necessary to ensure mission success. Economy of force is using the necessary amount of units needed while still having an effective armed forces. All elements need a purpose in order to be used effectively during an operation. Economy of force was used when attacking and recapturing the capital of Seoul. Various units were used in order to effectively have the city surrounded and supported by UN forces. While units all had an essential and clear role in surrounding and capturing the city, units were then moved and used to support other areas that would support the overall mission. This was seen when a regiment of the 7th Infantry Division was ordered to flank around the city in order to support the mission form the south. Economy of force was evident during this battle as units were used as necessary in order to create the most effective result within as minimum force needed. Maneuver is about creating the most effective movement during an operation that gives them the greatest advantage, protection, and ultimately, the upper hand. Maneuver is about the ability to use flexible combat power. Maneuver was seen in the Battle of Inchon by the movement and maneuver of the units used to flank Inchon, Seoul, and other key locations that were captured. By maneuvering elements to flank around and catch the enemy off guard, UN forces were able to gain the advantage during battle. Maneuver was also seen when entering the Inchon shore and having units coordinate with the tidal conditions, although a disadvantage at some points, it was an advantage later on as units were then on the shores and able to attack the enemy. Maneuver is a component that is seen throughout the Battle of Inchon as well. Unity of command is about having one commander throughout an operation to ensure clear leadership. Overall, General of the Army MacArthur was the commander of the UN forces during Operation Chromite and create the plan that was then prepared for and executed. General MacArthur was able to lead the UN forces during this time so that they would effectively disrupt the enemy, its resupply, and capture key areas. Furthermore, Major General Almond can be seen as unity of command under the 10th Corps during the 22 day operation. Unity of command was clearly seen during the Battle of Inchon and throughout the Korean War. Security is about maintaining control of areas, intelligence, and acquiring counter intelligence when necessary. Security is key during battle to ensure success and to maintain the upper hand. Security was maintained throughout the Battle of Inchon in a variety of ways. First, intelligence and reconnaissance was conducted and collected prior to the pre-invasion bombardments. Furthermore, the island off the coast was first secure for friendly units. Security was always the top priority for each of the areas that the UN forces sought to capture. Security was maintained at all times during the Battle of Inchon to ensure that at no point was the upper hand given to the enemy. The final principle of war is simplicity, which is having a clear, concise, and uncomplicated plan. Simplicity is key so that all elements are able to understand their purpose, and the commander’s intent and end state. Simplicity was seen throughout the Battle of Inchon because of the simple flanking that UN forces would initiate to capture key areas and locations. Simplicity is the ability to create a basic plan that all can understand, which all participating units during the Battle of Inchon understood during that time. All nine of the principles of war can be clearly seen in the Battle of Inchon. Each principle is key in the planning, preparation, and execution of each element of the battle. Every step had each of these principles in mind and this factor led to the success of General MacArthur and the UN forces. The Battle of Inchon can be seen as a success for the UN forces because of its successful planning and results in capturing Inchon, Seoul, and key airfields and locations. The importance of this battle was not only to capture these areas, but to also ultimately create the opportunity for forces down in the southeast Pusan peninsula to be able to attack back and push the North Korean People’s Army farther north.